Plato versus the Soul Paparazzi: A Philosophical Reality Show

Want to Know What’s Cooking in Plato’s Republic Without Reading All Those Pages? Well, you just gotta read this post!

Plato, the Big Brother of Antiquity 

So, let's take a jaunt back in time, not quite at the speed of light, but fast enough to trip over tunics and sandals. Let me introduce you to Plato, the Big Brother of antiquity. This guy didn't have hidden cameras or microphones, but he had something much more powerful: philosophy.

IImagine Plato as the house leader of a Big Brother that nobody asked for, but everyone watches. The house? An ideal city-state called Kallipolis, where philosophers are the VIPs and the rest of the people just make up the audience. And like any good reality show, there are some pretty strict rules of the game.

Plato, looking like he's just unraveled the mystery of the universe, gets everyone to sit in a circle (because geometry matters, folks) and starts his show. He and Socrates, who's pretty much the Simon Cowell of philosophy, begin tossing out ideas about how the ideal society should work.

"Justice," Socrates proclaims, raising a finger as if he's about to unveil the secret of Coca-Cola, "is about doing what's best for the city, not for yourself. And who's better than a philosopher to know what's best?" Here, you can almost hear the audience (i.e., the other philosophers) holding their breath, imagining themselves donning those laurel crowns they so richly deserve.

But it's not all roses and philosophy, friends. In Plato's world, if you're not a philosopher, well, it's like being the last to arrive at a party and discovering there’s not even a chip left. Your opinion matters little, and your life is planned by the intellectual elite. Like the idea of someone else deciding your job, your hobbies, and even who you should marry? No? Well, according to Plato, it's not a big problem—not for you, at least.

In short, Plato is the Big Brother who watches your every move, only instead of eliminating you, he "re-educates" you philosophically until you understand that his ideal city is the best place to be. And if you don't agree, maybe you're just not philosopher enough to get it. Or maybe, just maybe, Plato forgot that philosophers can be wrong, too.

How good is this Plato, really? 

Let’s get comfortable and prepare for a dive into the past, back when beards were mandatory and wine was watered down (because, clearly, being sober philosophers wasn’t fun enough).

First off, we have to admit that Plato had the sharpest pen in ancient Athens. The guy knew how to make the ink flow! In his dialogues, characters jump off the page more vividly than you could imagine for a conversation that's over two thousand years old. It's not just a bar chat, friends. It's a conversation that might make you reconsider your entire existence.

And then there's the style: Plato isn’t one of those guys who gives you everything pre-chewed. No, he throws a philosophical idea at you like a frisbee and waits on the other side of the field, ready to see if you can catch it or if it hits you in the face and knocks you down. And trust me, that frisbee can be heavy.

But just between us, the best thing about Plato is how he makes complex things simple and simple things complex. Want to talk about justice? Brace yourself for a journey from "who should govern" to "why you shouldn't eat your cake and have your neighbor’s too." And all this while Socrates, Plato’s protégé, makes every thought of yours look like a half-baked idea.

However, all that glitters is not gold in Plato's world. His "Republic" is more layered than a wedding cake, and trying to digest all those layers might leave you with a serious philosophical stomachache. For every "Aha!" moment, there are about five "Um, could you repeat that?"

So, how good is this Plato? Well, let’s say if philosophy were a restaurant, Plato would be a Michelin-starred chef who sometimes forgets that not all his guests are gourmet critics. The food is excellent, but you might need a dictionary to understand the menu. Rating? Let’s give it a 7/10, because even geniuses can be a bit too genius for the rest of us mere mortals.

Why I recommend it

"The Republic" is like that TV series everyone claims to love but no one actually watches. It challenges you to think about human flaws—like greed or laziness—not just as bar gossip, but as real issues that a society of philosophers might solve. Or at least they try, come on.

Why I don’t recommend it

I don't recommend it if your idea of philosophical reading is scrolling through celebrity tweets quoting Buddha. Plato requires you to actually think, and thinking hurts. Especially if you have to consider human flaws without blaming Instagram.